/ /

  • linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    Study: Visual acuity outcomes similar, but FLACS has some advantages

    Better refractive prediction with FLACS than manual surgery


    Distance-corrected near visual acuity was 20/36 in the FLACS group compared with 20/37 in the manual group. Sixteen percent of eyes were 20/20 or better in the FLACS group compared with 10% in the manual group, and 48% were 20/30 or better versus 50%, respectively. Seventy percent of patients in the FLACS group were 20/40 or better compared with 76% in the manual surgery group.

    The laser group had a higher percentage of patients with accuracy to refractive target, Dr. Whitman said, in which 80% were within 0.5 D compared with 72% in the manual group, and 92% in the laser group were within 0.75 D compared with 86% in the manual group.

    Although both groups had excellent results, FLACS had an edge. “FLACS provides potential advantages over manual technique due to more precise capsulotomy and reduced phaco energy,” Dr. Whitman concluded. 


    Jeffrey Whitman, MD

    E: [email protected]

    This article was adapted from Dr. Whitman’s presentation at the 2016 meeting of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. He is a consultant and conducts research for Bausch + Lomb.

    New Call-to-action


    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available


    View Results